This post has been edited by AllenIverson#1fan: 28 July 2010 - 10:23 PM
Page 1 of 1
Thoughts on remaining FAs
#1
Posted 28 July 2010 - 10:20 PM
Where do you think the remaining FAs T-Mac, Iverson, and Shaq will go and others. ( I know I forgot some)
#2
Posted 28 July 2010 - 10:39 PM
Hopefully they all retire.
Put it together, I rock hoes, y'all rock fellas

NBA Dynasty Sim League... The Best Around

NBA Dynasty Sim League... The Best Around
#3
Posted 28 July 2010 - 10:41 PM


Canes 1-0
#4
Posted 28 July 2010 - 10:52 PM
Shaq to the Lakers for one more run then he should retire. The rest should just retire right now.
#5
Posted 28 July 2010 - 10:59 PM
Shaq to Spurs/Retirement
T-Mac and AI retire because I doubt any team would want to sign a player that believes he's still starter material. But I wouldn't be surprised to see McGrady with the Clippers lol.
T-Mac and AI retire because I doubt any team would want to sign a player that believes he's still starter material. But I wouldn't be surprised to see McGrady with the Clippers lol.
#6
Posted 29 July 2010 - 05:55 AM
i honestly dont see any team wanting any of those guys except for shaq. i think tht if shaq would take less than the MLE than i think alot of teams would take a chance on him which would put the hawks at the top of that list.
HEAT GUNNA WIN IT ALL!!
#7
Posted 29 July 2010 - 06:47 AM
If he would accept the bench role, McGrady would fit in well with the Lakers. He's always been a candidate for the triangle offense, in my opinion, even in his prime.
As much as I dislike him and don't want him back, Shaq would be best in LA, backing up Bynum.
Iverson wouldn't fit in LA, though...definitely not a triangle player. If he's not ring-chasing, I think he should go to Charlotte and play under Larry Brown one last time. He'll start over Augustin and Livingston, more than likely. Otherwise, he should head out to Miami and see if they'll pay him the minimum.
As much as I dislike him and don't want him back, Shaq would be best in LA, backing up Bynum.
Iverson wouldn't fit in LA, though...definitely not a triangle player. If he's not ring-chasing, I think he should go to Charlotte and play under Larry Brown one last time. He'll start over Augustin and Livingston, more than likely. Otherwise, he should head out to Miami and see if they'll pay him the minimum.
#8
Posted 29 July 2010 - 06:55 AM
Real Deal, on 28 July 2010 - 10:47 PM, said:
If he would accept the bench role, McGrady would fit in well with the Lakers. He's always been a candidate for the triangle offense, in my opinion, even in his prime.
As much as I dislike him and don't want him back, Shaq would be best in LA, backing up Bynum.
Iverson wouldn't fit in LA, though...definitely not a triangle player. If he's not ring-chasing, I think he should go to Charlotte and play under Larry Brown one last time. He'll start over Augustin and Livingston, more than likely. Otherwise, he should head out to Miami and see if they'll pay him the minimum.
As much as I dislike him and don't want him back, Shaq would be best in LA, backing up Bynum.
Iverson wouldn't fit in LA, though...definitely not a triangle player. If he's not ring-chasing, I think he should go to Charlotte and play under Larry Brown one last time. He'll start over Augustin and Livingston, more than likely. Otherwise, he should head out to Miami and see if they'll pay him the minimum.
i agree with the iverson opinion but i dont think that either McGrady or Shaq will go to the lakers. i agree tht they would be great fits there off the bench but i cant see it happening. besides the only one of them tht MIGHT let go of his ego a little bit is McGrady but i seriously doubt it. Shaq will never want to come off the bench wherever he goes i think he'd rather retire IMO.
HEAT GUNNA WIN IT ALL!!
#9
Posted 29 July 2010 - 09:36 AM
I don't see any team signing AI or T-Mac, Shaq will go to the Hawks because no other team would offer him a contract.

Made by me.
No one man should have all that power.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1































Help


Back to top
MultiQuote

















